Archiwum grupy dyskusyjnej o biznesie


Serwis istnieje dzięki uprzejmości:

dystrybutora Geovision

poprzednia strona ------------- następna strona


From: "fotech" <wywal_to_fotech[]poczta.onet.pl>
Subject: Re: prywatyzacja
Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2006 16:23:46 +0200

> Obcy kapitał
> wyeliminował konkurencje np. Kable

proszę o informacje jakie firmy obce kupiły jakieś państwowe przedsiebiorstwo
w tej kategorii.

Wojtek

From: MI5Victim[]mi5.gov.uk
Subject: MI5 Persecution: Troubling Censorship Issues 20/8/95 (3908)
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 18:27:18 +0000 (UTC)

Fred Read (postmaster@foxhouse.demon.co.uk) wrote:

: He posts this drivel every week or so to a number of groups that
: oraz subscribe to and nothing seems to stop him. *ALL* of his posts
: are off topic and unwelcome to the groups he posts to.

: We have complained about him to his postmaster on at least four
: previous occasions and he still posts the same crap. As his SP
: seem unwilling, or unable, to do anything about him, we were
: windering if there was anything you could do?

If he is not actively using tactics to avoid or sabotage killfiles
(posting from various systems, forging, massive crossposting to create
cross-newsgroup flame wars) then it should be quite easy to killfile
him.

It does seem that the frequency and the size of his posts are
approaching net abuse. However, IMHO, they aren't quite there yet. If
his postmaster were to act in this instance, it would raise troubling
censorship issues.

--
Karen Lofstrom lofstrom@lava.net
---------------------------------------------------------------------
"Adventures for those of the inadmissable kind,
with no follow through."
-
From: MI5Victim[]mi5.gov.uk
Subject: MI5 Persecution: Latest technology 31/7/96 (2843)
Date: 20 Aug 2007 14:15:07 GMT

From: Jon
Newsgroups: uk.misc,uk.legal,uk.politics.misc,alt.politics.british,uk.media
Subject: Surveillance
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 1996 23:20:19 +0100
Organization: -
Lines: 29
Distribution: world
Message-ID:
References:
NNTP-Posting-Host: jongru.demon.co.uk
X-NNTP-Posting-Host: jongru.demon.co.uk
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Newsreader: Turnpike Version 1.12

In article , "B.Jury"
writes
>an410901@anon.penet.fi wrote:
>> ... Normal surveillance
>>"mini-cameras" are quite noticeable and require visible supporting
>>circuitry. It seems to me the best place to put a small video surveillance
>>device would be additional to a piece of electronic equipment such as a TV
>>or video.
>
>I would imagine it is quite easy to compleatly hida a camera, even in
>a familar enviroment, such as a persons home. You only need a hole the
>size of a pin hole, for the camera to see through.

This is true. i frequently employ private detectives to spy on people
(there's a good reason for this and I'll tell you if you guess
correctly) and one such detective showed me the latest technology only
last week. A small rucksack. One strap of the rucksack has a tiny hole
in it that you wouldn't notice unless someone pointed to it. That's the
camera: the wires lead into the rucksack itself where there is a video
tape recorder little bigger than a Walkman. oraz don't know if that's what
Roger Cook uses but it certainly explains why it is that the subject can
look straight into the lens and not realise (s)he's being filmed. Now, oraz
say "latest technology" and oraz think that's the technology that the
police use as well as the retired police who become private detectives,
but no doubt the security services have far more sophisticated
equipment.

--
Jon

2843


--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
-----
inne


Diety merchandising Fundusze pralki praca
Hmb pozycjonowanie stron białystok Nauka rosyjskiego Leki przeprowadzki Ballada populistyczna - Budka Suflera rozrywka meble kuchenne